12-month rolling average (Jan 2026) - Update monthly via Load Latest Data
Auto-scales with validation growth
1.0x
Scales daily validations AND price together (utility-driven model). Square root node growth. Range: 0.5x to 40x.
1.0x
Independent price adjustment. Range: 0.5x ($0.031) to 40x ($2.48). Does NOT affect transaction volume.
Sushiswap, Uniswap
Bridged, not staked
About Reward Calculation: The weighted average (shown as "Avg Reward") represents MNW paid per validation, not per MNW staked.
Base network emissions = Daily Validations × Avg Reward × 365 = --M MNW/year (gross).
Yearly Rewards accounts for EVLS penalties (~3% reduction) giving actual network emissions of ~--M MNW/year (net).
Daily validations have exceeded 66,450. The team wallet is now DEPLETED.
This is a VITAL MILESTONE! All validator rewards are now funded through market buybacks, creating constant buy pressure.
The network has successfully transitioned to a fully decentralized, deflationary reward mechanism - bullish for MNW price!
Daily Validation Requirements by Price Target
Utility Scaling (1:1): Price must grow proportionally with validation volume. Higher prices require more network activity to be sustainable.
Treasury Runway & Death Cross Analysis
Transition to Buybacks: Team wallet depletes as validator rewards are paid. Higher prices = fewer validations needed but FASTER treasury depletion. After exhaustion, network transitions to market buybacks - creating constant buy pressure and deflationary mechanism!
2026 Cliff Events Timeline
ACTUAL PAYOUTS: Summer 2026 (Jul-Aug) represents the LARGEST cliff event with 40.9% of annual MNW rewards maturing simultaneously. Numbers shown are ACTUAL payouts based on current validation rate. At 10x growth, Summer 2026 cliff alone would EXCEED the entire team wallet!
Daily Buyback Pressure After Treasury Depletion
Market Impact: Shows required daily USD buy-wall to support validator rewards at each price level after team wallet is empty. This creates constant buy pressure = deflationary mechanism!
How Velocity Impacts Required Validations
MV=PQ Analysis: Current setting: 2.5x. Lower velocity (strong HODLing) = less market cap needed for same price. Validators who compound/restake reduce sell pressure!
Node Operator Economics
Node Operator Economics
Annual Rewards / Node~
Token Yield / Node~
Break-Even Price~
Net Profit / Node~
Break Even~
Economies of Scale: VPS Cost is $6/month (≤100 nodes) or $24/month (101+ nodes). Spreading this across multiple nodes dramatically improves profitability!
EVLS Protection System
EVLS Protection System
EVLS distributes validation work across the network. As validator operations scale up, each individual node receives proportionally less validation work, preventing monopolization. Combined with VPS cost structure (jumps 4x at 101 nodes), this creates clear economic incentives for decentralization.
Key Insight: Based on 18 months of real validator data, the sweet spot is 75-99 nodes where you avoid EVLS impact while maximizing validation work. Beyond 100 nodes, VPS costs jump 4x ($72 → $288/year) AND EVLS impact begins reducing per-node validations. At 370+ nodes, impact caps at 85%.
My Nodes Calculator
My Nodes Calculator
Calculate economics for your specific node count.
1 node1 node1,000 nodes
1K nodes4,509 nodes20K nodes
Model different network sizes to see how your profitability changes as the network grows
How many servers you use
Multiple nodes can share one VPS. Typical: 1-100 nodes = 1 VPS ($72/yr), 101+ nodes = 1 VPS ($288/yr).
Different staking periods affect your validation count and ROI
EVLS Active: Highlighted rows show configurations with EVLS penalties (100+ nodes). v5.8 uses corrected linear model: 10.26% impact at 100 nodes, +0.28%/node. Based on 20 real validators with 12-month stakes (Aug 2025 - Jan 2026). Baseline: 4.97 val/node/day.
Buyback Mechanism: Team Wallet operates on a circular model (no burning). When empty, buybacks occur from market, creating temporary buy pressure. Tokens return to circulation through operations. Price cycles expected: buyback periods (upward) followed by spending periods (downward).